For most of the modern history of European energy policy, electricity, natural gas, and oil were treated as adjacent but fundamentally separate domains. They were regulated through different frameworks, traded on different venues, analysed by different expert communities, and governed by distinct political narratives. Electricity was a question of grids, generators, and marginal pricing. Gas revolved around contracts, storage, and security of supply. Oil belonged to a global geopolitical arena shaped by shipping routes, benchmarks, and strategic reserves. This separation was not merely conceptual; it reflected a physical and economic reality in which energy flows were relatively linear and predictable.
That reality has disappeared. What Europe operates today is no longer a set of parallel energy markets, but a single, integrated energy system expressed through three fuels. The implications of this shift reach far beyond pricing mechanics. They redefine how risk propagates, how volatility is generated, how infrastructure constrains outcomes, and how policy interventions interact with markets. Understanding energy in Europe now requires abandoning the sectoral lens and adopting a system perspective in which electricity, gas, and oil are inseparable components of the same structure.
The transformation did not occur because policymakers designed it that way. It emerged organically, through market integration, infrastructure interconnection, financialisation, and the rapid expansion of variable renewable generation. Each of these forces tightened the coupling between fuels, compressing reaction times and amplifying feedback loops. The result is a system in which shocks no longer remain local, stability cannot be assessed in isolation, and calm in one segment often masks stress accumulating elsewhere.
Electricity sits at the visible centre of this system, not because it dominates energy volumes, but because it clears last. Power markets absorb and reflect conditions from upstream fuel markets, infrastructure availability, weather patterns, and regulatory interventions in real time. Gas supply tightness, LNG diversion decisions, refinery outages, wind and solar variability, carbon prices, and geopolitical risk all converge in electricity prices. Power has become the point where assumptions about the entire energy system are stress-tested continuously.
Natural gas occupies the system’s balancing spine. In Europe’s current generation mix, gas is neither baseload nor merely a transitional fuel. It is the primary instrument through which variability from renewables is converted into dispatchable energy. Gas-fired power plants are increasingly called upon not to run steadily, but to respond precisely when the system is under stress. This operational role gives gas disproportionate influence over power prices. A marginal change in gas availability or price can trigger outsized movements in electricity markets, particularly during periods of low renewable output or constrained infrastructure.
Oil, often assumed to have exited the electricity conversation decades ago, has re-entered the system through indirect but powerful channels. Refineries are among the largest industrial energy consumers, linking oil margins directly to gas and power prices. Shipping costs, driven by refined fuel availability and geopolitical risk, shape LNG netbacks and thus gas flows into Europe. Geopolitical risk premia embedded in oil benchmarks influence investor sentiment and trading behaviour across the entire energy complex. Oil no longer fuels electrons directly, but it sets the outer boundary of energy risk.
The unifying characteristic of this integrated system is volatility. In a sectoral world, volatility could be analysed and managed within individual markets. Power volatility reflected real-time balancing constraints. Gas volatility followed seasonal storage cycles. Oil volatility emerged episodically from geopolitical shocks. Today, volatility is systemic. It travels across fuels, crosses borders, and persists across time horizons. A disturbance in one segment redistributes stress throughout the system rather than dissipating.
This redistribution is enabled by physical infrastructure and accelerated by financial markets. Cross-border interconnectors and pipelines allow energy to move quickly in response to price signals, compressing regional differences under normal conditions. Under stress, the same channels transmit scarcity. Financial integration ensures that expectations adjust simultaneously across fuels, increasing correlations precisely when diversification is most needed. What once unfolded over months now unfolds over days or hours.
South-East Europe illustrates this convergence with particular clarity. The region sits at the intersection of multiple gas corridors, power interconnectors, and oil transit routes, while simultaneously integrating renewable capacity faster than flexibility solutions. Serbia, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Croatia, Greece, and Italy are linked not only by cables and pipelines, but by shared exposure to marginal dynamics. A gas storage decision in Central Europe can influence power prices in the Balkans. LNG flows into Italy shape electricity spreads across the Adriatic. Oil logistics disruptions in the Mediterranean reverberate through gas and power markets across the region.
This reality undermines the traditional analytical approach that treats energy markets as silos. Stable electricity prices do not guarantee system stability if gas markets are tightening or infrastructure is approaching its limits. Comfortable gas storage levels do not ensure calm power markets if renewable variability and interconnector congestion coincide. Even apparent stability across all three fuels can mask accumulated stress that will surface abruptly when conditions change.
The financialisation of energy has intensified these dynamics. Traders, utilities, and industrial consumers increasingly manage exposure at the portfolio level rather than by fuel. Hedging strategies that assume stable correlations break down during stress, when markets move together. Forward curves embed cross-fuel expectations, while prompt markets reflect immediate system constraints. Price discovery has become a system-wide process, compressing reaction times and amplifying feedback loops.
Regulation has struggled to adapt to this integrated reality. Policy frameworks remain fragmented along fuel and national lines, even as risk has become unified. Electricity market design assumes gas will be available at reasonable cost when needed. Gas policy assumes power-sector demand will remain predictable. Oil policy focuses on physical security of supply, often ignoring indirect channels through which oil influences gas and power. This mismatch between regulatory silos and market integration has itself become a source of volatility.
Interventions intended to stabilise one market frequently shift stress elsewhere. Price caps in electricity markets can distort gas demand and storage incentives. Gas-market measures prioritising national security can tighten regional balances, affecting power prices beyond the regulating country’s borders. Oil-related sanctions or logistics regulations alter shipping economics, reshaping LNG flows and power-market outcomes indirectly. In a unified system, no intervention remains local.
The integrated nature of the system also alters how stability should be assessed. Stability is no longer a property of individual markets, but an emergent characteristic of the system as a whole. It depends on flexibility, redundancy, and coordination across fuels and borders. A system can appear stable precisely because stress is being absorbed elsewhere. When that absorption capacity is exhausted, stability collapses abruptly and across multiple segments.
This shift has profound implications for investment. Assets that add energy volume without flexibility struggle to capture value in volatile markets. By contrast, assets that provide response speed, endurance, or optionality earn scarcity rents during stress. Batteries, storage, flexible gas capacity, and interconnection upgrades increasingly define the economics of the energy transition. Capital flows toward flexibility not because of policy slogans, but because markets price its scarcity relentlessly.
For industrial consumers, the system perspective changes procurement logic. Energy costs are no longer driven by average prices, but by exposure to volatility and system stress. Managing risk requires understanding how gas, power, and oil interact under different scenarios, rather than negotiating isolated contracts. The cost of ignoring system dynamics is increasing unpredictability and vulnerability during stress events.
For policymakers, the challenge is even greater. Designing rules for integrated markets requires recognising interdependencies rather than suppressing them. Policies that aim to stabilise prices without addressing underlying flexibility and infrastructure constraints tend to postpone adjustment rather than prevent it. Over time, this increases the severity of future shocks. Stability borrowed from the future is rarely repaid cheaply.
South-East Europe’s experience underscores the urgency of this systemic perspective. The region often absorbs shocks generated elsewhere, yet its reactions shape outcomes across the continent. Observing price behaviour, flow reversals, and congestion in SEE markets offers insight into the health of Europe’s energy system as a whole. The region functions as a stress test not because it is uniquely fragile, but because it operates close to the system’s margins.
The concept of one energy system expressed through three fuels is therefore not an analytical abstraction. It is a description of how Europe’s energy markets actually behave. Electricity reveals stress, gas absorbs imbalance, and oil transmits global risk. Together, they form a tightly coupled structure in which stability cannot be inferred locally and volatility cannot be isolated.
Recognising this reality is the foundation for understanding everything that follows: why volatility has become structural, why gas sits at the centre of price formation, why oil’s influence has returned through logistics and risk premia, why infrastructure constraints dominate outcomes, and why flexibility has become the system’s most valuable currency. The energy transition is not unfolding across separate markets. It is unfolding within a single system whose behaviour is defined by interaction rather than isolation.
Elevated by clarion.energy
